"Quietways, will be lower-intervention and mainly on streets with less traffic."
The most common thing people say to me is, "I love cycling." The second most common thing people say is, "Isn't it dangerous?" However, there aren't many people who say both of them. Now this leaves us with three types of cyclist:
- Lovers: people who cycle for commuting, for getting around London, for pleasure or for a mixture of all three. Cycling works for them - so not really city planners' problem. Yes, infrastructure could be improved, there could be more showers, more cycle parking and motorists could be more considerate - but essentially converted cyclists.
- Danger-fearers: people who don't cycle but could be convinced to. This is perhaps the kind of cyclist who could be encouraged to cycle if a safe, back-street route which passed close to their home and place of work could be built effectively. A target audience for Quietways? Yes.
- Occasional cyclists: people who both love cycling but are scared about doing it regularly because of the barriers that exist to allow them to do it whilst feeling secure. Again, if reliable, easy to follow routes existed for these users then they would feel safer cycling more often and might encourage their friends and family to cycle to. This type of cyclist would probably use a combination of cycle super highways and quietways to broaden their knowledge about routes around London and to feel more secure.
This outlines a number of routes around central London, both existing Cycle Super Highways and new along with a series of Quietways. Now, it's not certain what form these will take or how they will join up with the rest of of the London cycling network, or even how much of it will be implemented but it is certainly ambitious!